Skip to main content

Do I need a firewall and is XP’s firewall OK?

Do I need a firewall and is XP’s firewall OK?

Having a constant connection to the Internet while not running any security program is very risky. A common comparison is like leaving the keys in your car with the engine running and the doors unlocked while you run into the store. You may only be gone for a few moments and many times no one will notice. But, if you do this every day, it won’t take long before your car is gone!

Hackers have software that combs the Internet for open (computer) doors. While some are simple nuisances that may play simple pranks, others are created with malicious intent. These more severe strains may attempt to delete information from your computer, crash it, or more commonly, steal personal information, such as passwords or credit card numbers. Some hackers enjoy nothing better than breaking into vulnerable computers. A firewall can help protect your computer against these and other security attacks.

If you have a dialup connection, then the XP firewall is probably good enough. Dialup connections are not easily attacked due to the online inconsistencies and the fact that the IP address is changed with each connection. Those connections that are full time, such as DSL or Cable are much more likely to be targeted. You should have a more reliable firewall, up-to-date and functioning at all times. I use, and recommend ZoneAlarm. But, there are many others to choose from, such as: BlackIce, eTrust, Fireball, Freedom/Hacker Stopper, F-Secure, Kerio, Look’n'Stop, McAfee, Norton, Outpost, Panda, PC-cillin, Preventon, PrivateFirewall, Sygate, Terminet, Tiny & Trustix.

Note: Though XP’s firewall is better than no firewall at all and compatible with any others you may use, XP’s firewall monitors incoming connections only. Should Back Orifice, NetBus, or any other backdoor program find its way onto your PC, XP’s firewall will do nothing to stop it from granting remote access to your system.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A KING WHO WAS POPULAL AMONG HIS PEOPLE (King Birendra)

King of Nepal Reign 31 January 1972 –1 June 2001 Predecessor Mahendra Successor Dipendra Consort Aishwarya Rajya Laxmi Devi Shah Father King Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev Mother Indra Rajya Laxmi Born 28 December 1945 Kathmandu, Nepal Died 1 June 2001 (aged 55) Kathmandu, Nepal Religion Hinduism Birendra and Aishwaraya had three children. Prince Dipendra (27 June 1971 – 4 June 2001) Princess Shruti (15 October 1976 – 1 June 2001) Prince Nirajan (6 November 1977–1 June 2001) Known As: A soft-spoken man with glasses and a mustacheKing Birendra was 10th in his line to rule Nepal and considered by some to be an incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu.On formal occasions, the king was known for stilted speeches full of jargon that did not generate much inspiration.He was more at ease and best liked for listening closely to the problems of common people, especially poor villagers in a country that is among the poorest in the world with ...

A KING WHO WAS FAMOUS (His Majesty King Mahendra)

King Mahendra  Born > 11 June 1920 Father > King Tribhuvan Bir Bikram Shah Married To >  Indra Rajya Laxmi, daughter of General Hari Shamsher Rana in 1940 . Three sons >  Birendra,  Gyanendra, and Dhirendra Three daughters >Shanti, Sharada and Shobha. After Queen Indra died in 1950. In 1952 Mahendra married Indra's sister Ratna Rajya Lakshmi Devi. Crowned > May 2, 1956 Mahendra was made a British Field Marshal in 1960. Mahendra implemented a land reform policy, which provided land to many landless people. The Mahendra Highway (also called East-West Highway) that runs along the entire Terai belt in southern Nepal was constructed during his reign. He played a key role in making Nepal a member of the United Nations. Mahendra died with a heart attack while hunting in Chitwan with Tiger Tops Hotel. It is believed  that his death was a conspiracy of CIA as John Coapman who was also proprietor of  Chitwan with Tiger Tops Hotel was ...

Quest Software’s Unicode (UTF-8)

Please make note of the following caveats Toad for Oracle supports any single-byte character set. Enabling UTF-8 does not automatically cause issues with Toad. The use of double-byte or multi-byte character does not automatically result in issues with Toad, provided that the Oracle database Client/Server configuration settings are in synch. For instance, Toad for Oracle is used extensively in Korea and it works well. Issues can arise with certain combinations of the Oracle client NLS settings and Windows regional settings. However, they seem to occur only when inserting or updating data (there are some scenarios in which data retrieval can cause issues). This makes it crucial for the database, client and OS to be in synch with any internationalization settings. In addition, when using UTF-8 data in the editor or a grid, a font that supports the desired characters must be selected as the default font. Mono-space fonts (also known as fixed-width or non-proportional) will not support...